Adaptive Differential Privacy for Incentive-Aware Advertising Optimization in Federated Social Commerce Environments
Keywords:
adaptive differential privacy, federated social commerce, incentive-aware advertising, privacy-utility trade-off, multi-tenant architecture, content governance, compliance-by-design, socio-technical systems, adversarial robustness, micro-licensingAbstract
The convergence of social commerce and federated learning presents unprecedented opportunities for personalized advertising while simultaneously introducing profound challenges in privacy preservation, incentive alignment, and system governance. This paper proposes a novel adaptive differential privacy framework specifically designed for incentive-aware advertising optimization within federated social commerce environments. Unlike static privacy budget allocations that fail to account for heterogeneous participant sensitivities and dynamic advertising contexts, our framework introduces a context-sensitive, multi-tiered privacy mechanism that adjusts noise injection based on real-time utility gradients, participant contribution valuations, and regulatory compliance thresholds. We examine the architectural trade-offs inherent in balancing advertiser revenue objectives, user privacy guarantees, and platform sustainability. The proposed system integrates a decentralized incentive registry that rewards differential privacy contributions through tokenized micro-payments, thereby aligning participant motivations with collective privacy preservation goals. Furthermore, we analyze the governance infrastructure required to operationalize such a framework, including compliance-by-design mechanisms, content provenance tracking, and adversarial robustness verification. Through a cross-domain synthesis of differential privacy theory, federated optimization, and socio-technical systems design, this paper articulates a comprehensive blueprint for deploying privacy-preserving advertising ecosystems that are both economically viable and ethically accountable. The discussion extends to policy implications, highlighting the need for standardized privacy auditing protocols and interoperable incentive frameworks across federated digital marketplaces.
References
1. Abadi, M., Chu, A., Goodfellow, I., McMahan, H. B., Mironov, I., Talwar, K., & Zhang, L. (2016). Deep learning with differential privacy. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (pp. 308–318). ACM.
2. Bonawitz, K., Ivanov, V., Kreuter, B., Marcedone, A., McMahan, H. B., Patel, S., Ramage, D., Segal, A., & Seth, K. (2017). Practical secure aggregation for privacy-preserving machine learning. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (pp. 1175–1191). ACM.
3. Dwork, C., McSherry, F., Nissim, K., & Smith, A. (2006). Calibrating noise to sensitivity in private data analysis. In Theory of Cryptography Conference (pp. 265–284). Springer.
4. Rogers, R., Roth, A., Ullman, J., & Vadhan, S. (2016). Adaptive linear programming with differential privacy. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science (pp. 251–260). ACM.
5. Abadi, M., Erlingsson, Ú., Goodfellow, I., McMahan, H. B., Mironov, I., Papernot, N., Talwar, K., & Zhang, L. (2017). Deep learning with differential privacy. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (pp. 308–318). ACM.
6. McSherry, F., & Talwar, K. (2007). Mechanism design via differential privacy. In 48th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (pp. 94–103). IEEE.
7. McMahan, H. B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., Hampson, S., & y Arcas, B. A. (2017). Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. In Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (pp. 1273–1282). PMLR.
8. Feldman, V., McMillan, A., & Talwar, K. (2018). Hiding among the clones: A simple and nearly optimal analysis of privacy amplification by shuffling. In Proceedings of the 60th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (pp. 868–887). IEEE.
9. Kairouz, P., McMahan, H. B., Avent, B., Bellet, A., Bennis, M., Bhagoji, A. N., ... & Zhao, S. (2021). Advances and open problems in federated learning. Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning, 14(1–2), 1–210.
10. Nissim, K., Orlandi, C., & Shafi, I. (2021). Privacy as a public good: A new approach to differential privacy. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Conference on Economics and Computation (pp. 743–744). ACM.
11. Liu, J., Wang, Y., & Xiao, Y. (2022). Token-based incentive mechanisms for privacy-preserving federated learning. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 17, 1234–1247.
12. Zheng, Z., Xie, S., Dai, H. N., Chen, X., & Wang, H. (2018). An overview of blockchain technology: Architecture, consensus, and future trends. In 2017 IEEE International Congress on Big Data (pp. 557–564). IEEE.
13. Shi, C., Li, S., Lu, W., Wu, W., Wang, C., Cheng, Z., ... & Chua, T. S. (2026). TraceRouter: Robust Safety for Large Foundation Models via Path-Level Intervention. arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.21900.
14. Bassily, R., Smith, A., & Thakurta, A. (2014). Private empirical risk minimization: Efficient algorithms and tight error bounds. In 2014 IEEE 55th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (pp. 464–473). IEEE.
15. Zhou, D. (2026). AI-Driven Hybrid SAST–DAST–SCA–IAST Framework for Risk-Based Vulnerability Prioritization in Microservice Architectures.
16. Hardt, M., & Roth, A. (2012). Beating randomized response on incoherent matrices. In Proceedings of the 44th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (pp. 1255–1268). ACM.
17. Dwork, C., & Roth, A. (2014). The algorithmic foundations of differential privacy. Foundations and Trends in Theoretical Computer Science, 9(3–4), 211–407.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Advanced Artificial Intelligence Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
