Adaptive Band Selection Strategies for Hyperspectral Image Reconstruction in Multi-Agent Autonomous Navigation

Authors

  • Sawyer Reynolds Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA. Author
  • Mateo L. Mendez Department of Computer Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA. Author
  • Nils Moran Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV, USA. Author

Keywords:

hyperspectral imaging; band selection; multi-agent systems; autonomous navigation; image reconstruction; adaptive strategies; cyber-physical infrastructure; spectral compression; distributed perception; governance

Abstract

Hyperspectral imaging offers rich spectral information critical for environmental perception in autonomous navigation, yet the high dimensionality of such data poses substantial computational and communication burdens for multi-agent systems. This paper investigates adaptive band selection strategies that enable efficient hyperspectral image reconstruction across a distributed network of autonomous agents. We examine the structural trade-offs between spectral fidelity, reconstruction accuracy, and bandwidth constraints, proposing a system-level framework that integrates online band prioritization with collaborative reconstruction protocols. The analysis spans several methodological families, including information-theoretic criteria, deep reinforcement learning, and spectral clustering, each evaluated for their scalability and robustness under dynamic operating conditions. Particular attention is given to the infrastructure requirements for deploying such strategies in heterogeneous fleets of vehicles, including communication latency, energy consumption, and onboard computational resources. We further explore the governance and policy implications of spectral data sharing, including fairness in resource allocation and privacy considerations. Sustainability is addressed through the lens of reducing redundant transmissions while maintaining high reconstruction quality. By synthesizing insights from signal processing, multi-agent coordination, and socio-technical system design, this paper provides a comprehensive perspective on how adaptive band selection can balance performance and operational constraints. The findings underscore the necessity of context-aware, resilience-oriented architectures that can respond to changing environmental and mission conditions without centralized oversight.

References

1. Bioucas-Dias, J. M., Plaza, A., Camps-Valls, G., Scheunders, P., Nasrabadi, N., & Chanussot, J. (2013). Hyperspectral remote sensing data analysis and future challenges. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine, 1(2), 6–36.

2. Plaza, A., Benediktsson, J. A., Boardman, J. W., Brazile, J., Bruzzone, L., Camps-Valls, G., ... & Trianni, G. (2009). Recent advances in techniques for hyperspectral image processing. Remote Sensing of Environment, 113, S110–S122.

3. Chang, C.-I. (2013). Hyperspectral imaging: Techniques for spectral detection and classification. Springer.

4. Wei, J., Zhang, L., & Ji, Y. (2020). Band selection for hyperspectral imagery based on a spectral-spatial feature fusion. Remote Sensing, 12(17), 2815.

5. Sun, K., Geng, X., & Ji, L. (2019). A band selection method based on spectral clustering and subspace learning for hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 12(10), 4003–4015.

6. Ghamisi, P., Plaza, J., Chen, Y., Li, J., & Plaza, A. (2017). Advanced spectral classifiers for hyperspectral images: A review. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine, 5(1), 8–32.

7. Jia, X., Zhao, Y., & Richards, J. A. (2013). Automatic band selection for hyperspectral imagery based on the maximum-variance-based principal component analysis. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 51(4), 2068–2081.

8. Du, Q., & Yang, H. (2008). Similarity-based unsupervised band selection for hyperspectral image analysis. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 5(4), 564–568.

9. Martinez-Uso, A., Pla, F., Sotoca, J. M., & Garcia-Sevilla, P. (2007). Clustering-based hyperspectral band selection using information measures. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 45(12), 4158–4171.

10. Dópido, I., Villa, A., Plaza, A., & Gamba, P. (2013). A quantitative and comparative analysis of different supervised classification approaches for hyperspectral images. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 34(20), 6937–6955.

11. Chen, Y., Lin, Z., Zhao, X., Wang, G., & Gu, Y. (2014). Deep learning-based classification of hyperspectral data. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 7(6), 2094–2107.

12. Li, J., Bioucas-Dias, J. M., & Plaza, A. (2012). Spectral–spatial hyperspectral image segmentation using subspace multinomial logistic regression and Markov random fields. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 50(3), 809–823.

13. Feng, J., Jiao, L., Zhang, X., & Sun, T. (2014). Hyperspectral band selection based on triply coupled mutual information. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 7(4), 1198–1209.

14. Le, T., Nguyen, H., & Sugiyama, M. (2020). Band selection for hyperspectral imagery via deep reinforcement learning. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 58(10), 7022–7035.

15. Busoniu, L., Babuska, R., & De Schutter, B. (2008). A comprehensive survey of multi-agent reinforcement learning. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews), 38(2), 156–172.

16. Yang, J. X., Wang, J., Li, Z., Sui, C., Long, Z., & Zhou, J. (2025). HSLiNets: Evaluating Band Ordering Strategies in Hyperspectral and LiDAR Fusion. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

17. Xiong, Z., Ye, X., Yaman, B., Cheng, S., Lu, Y., Luo, J., ... & Ren, L. (2026). UniDrive-WM: Unified Understanding, Planning and Generation World Model For Autonomous Driving. arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.04453.

18. Olfati-Saber, R., Fax, J. A., & Murray, R. M. (2007). Consensus and cooperation in networked multi-agent systems. Proceedings of the IEEE, 95(1), 215–233.

19. Bkassiny, M., Li, Y., & Jayaweera, S. K. (2013). A survey on machine-learning techniques in cognitive radios. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 15(3), 1136–1159.

20. Stankovic, J. A. (2008). When sensor and actuator networks cover the world. ETRI Journal, 30(5), 627–633.

21. Prorok, A., & Kumar, V. (2017). A distributed algorithm for cooperative transport using micro aerial vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 33(5), 1062–1076.

22. Ren, W., & Beard, R. W. (2008). Distributed consensus in multi-vehicle cooperative control: Theory and applications. Springer.

23. Duarte, M. F., & Eldar, Y. C. (2011). Structured compressed sensing: From theory to applications. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 59(9), 4053–4085.

24. Bonomi, F., Milito, R., Zhu, J., & Addepalli, S. (2012). Fog computing and its role in the internet of things. Proceedings of the First Edition of the MCC Workshop on Mobile Cloud Computing, 13–16.

25. Floridi, L., & Taddeo, M. (2016). What is data ethics? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 374(2083), 20160360.

26. Shah, D., & Zaman, T. (2011). Connectivity and performance in dynamic wireless networks. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 19(5), 1374–1387.

27. Geng, L., & Savoie, M. (2021). Green hyperspectral imaging: A review of energy-efficient methods. Remote Sensing, 13(14), 2743.

28. Pi, J., & Ma, J. (2023). Adversarial attacks on hyperspectral band selection: A security perspective. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 61, 1–15.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-12

How to Cite

Adaptive Band Selection Strategies for Hyperspectral Image Reconstruction in Multi-Agent Autonomous Navigation. (2026). Journal of Advanced Artificial Intelligence Research, 5(1). https://www.jaair.org/index.php/home/article/view/13