Personalized Blood Pressure Estimation from Wearable Photoplethysmographic Signals Using Deep Learning

Authors

  • Tianzhang Meng Department of Computer Science, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. Author

Keywords:

blood pressure estimation, photoplethysmography, deep learning, wearable sensors, personalized medicine, system deployment

Abstract

Continuous blood pressure monitoring has long been constrained by cuff-based oscillometric devices that provide episodic measurements and interfere with natural activity. Wearable photoplethysmographic sensors offer a promising alternative because they can capture pulsatile vascular dynamics noninvasively and continuously at the wrist or fingertip. Deep learning can convert raw or lightly processed photoplethysmographic waveforms into estimates of systolic and diastolic blood pressure by learning complex temporal and morphological representations. However, translation from laboratory demonstrations to personalized care requires attention to system architecture, data governance, signal robustness, fairness, and long-term sustainability. This article examines the structural trade-offs involved in designing personalized blood pressure estimation systems from wearable photoplethysmographic signals using deep learning. It discusses signal processing foundations, architectural choices for compact and cloud-connected inference, personalization through transfer learning, federated learning, deployment infrastructure, regulatory and ethical implications, and failure modes caused by motion artifact, sensor drift, and population heterogeneity. Rather than focusing narrowly on algorithmic performance, the paper argues that clinically meaningful deployment depends on a socio-technical integration of sensing hardware, model lifecycle management, data protection, and health equity. The analysis includes cross-domain comparisons with other physiological monitoring systems and forward-looking perspectives on sustainable, fair, and robust personalized cardiovascular monitoring. The discussion highlights the importance of heterogeneous training data, prospective validation, and continuous quality assurance.

References

1. Allen, J. (2007). Photoplethysmography and its application in clinical physiological measurement. Physiological Measurement, 28(3), R1–R39.

2. Elgendi, M. (2012). On the analysis of fingertip photoplethysmogram signals. Current Cardiology Reviews, 8(1), 14–25.

3. Kachuee, M., Kiani, M. M., Mohammadzade, H., & Shabany, M. (2017). Cuffless blood pressure estimation algorithms for continuous health-care monitoring. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 64(4), 859–869.

4. Hasanzadeh, N., Ahmadi, M. M., & Mohammadzade, H. (2020). Blood pressure estimation using photoplethysmogram signal and its morphological features. IEEE Sensors Journal, 20(8), 4300–4310.

5. Slapničar, G., Mlakar, N., & Luštrek, M. (2019). Blood pressure estimation from photoplethysmogram using a spectro-temporal deep neural network. Sensors, 19(15), 3420.

6. Landry, C., Hedge, E. T., Hughson, R. L., Peterson, S. D., & Arami, A. (2021). Accurate blood pressure estimation using photoplethysmographic signals and a neural network with activity classification. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 25(11), 4095–4105.

7. Rastegar, S., GholamHosseini, H., & Lowe, A. (2020). Non-invasive continuous blood pressure monitoring systems: Current and proposed methods. IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, 13, 309–326.

8. Pan, S. J., & Yang, Q. (2010). A survey on transfer learning. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 22(10), 1345–1359.

9. Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long short-term memory. Neural Computation, 9(8), 1735–1780.

10. Liang, Y., Chen, Z., Ward, R., & Elgendi, M. (2018). Photoplethysmography and deep learning: Enhancing health risk assessment. Information Fusion, 41, 16–25.

11. Rajkomar, A., Dean, J., & Kohane, I. (2019). Machine learning in medicine. New England Journal of Medicine, 380(14), 1347–1358.

12. Topol, E. J. (2019). High-performance medicine: The convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nature Medicine, 25(1), 44–56.

13. Xu, J., Glicksberg, B. S., Su, C., Walker, P., Bian, J., & Wang, F. (2021). Federated learning for healthcare informatics. Journal of Healthcare Informatics Research, 5(1), 1–19.

14. Sheller, M. J., Reina, G. A., Edwards, B., Martin, J., & Bakas, S. (2020). Multi-institutional deep learning modeling without sharing patient data: A feasibility study on brain tumor segmentation. In Brainlesion: Glioma, Multiple Sclerosis, Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injuries (pp. 92–104). Springer.

15. Zheng, X., Dwyer, V. M., Barrett, L. A., Derakhshani, M., & Hu, S. (2023). Rapid vital sign extraction for real-time opto-physiological monitoring at varying physical activity intensity levels. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 27(7), 3107-3118.

16. Price, W. N., & Cohen, I. G. (2019). Privacy in the age of medical big data. Nature Medicine, 25(1), 37–43.

17. Mittelstadt, B. D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., & Floridi, L. (2016). The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 2053951716679679.

18. Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., & Galstyan, A. (2021). A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(6), 1–35.

19. Esteva, A., Robicquet, A., Ramsundar, B., Kuleshov, V., DePristo, M., Chou, K., Cui, C., Corrado, G., Thrun, S., & Dean, J. (2019). A guide to deep learning in healthcare. Nature Medicine, 25(1), 24–29.

20. Kelly, C. J., Karthikesalingam, A., Suleyman, M., Corrado, G., & King, D. (2019). Key challenges for delivering clinical impact with artificial intelligence. BMC Medicine, 17, 195.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-14

How to Cite

Personalized Blood Pressure Estimation from Wearable Photoplethysmographic Signals Using Deep Learning. (2026). Journal of Advanced Artificial Intelligence Research, 5(1). https://www.jaair.org/index.php/home/article/view/278