Graph Neural Network-Driven Knowledge Discovery and Recommendation in Large-Scale Heterogeneous Information Networks

Authors

  • Enzo Vega Department of Computer Science, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA. Author
  • Olivier Beed Department of Computer Science, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY, USA. Author
  • Vanya Drivastaes Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA. Author

Keywords:

graph neural networks, heterogeneous information networks, knowledge discovery, recommendation systems, scalability, fairness, governance, large-scale systems

Abstract

The proliferation of large-scale heterogeneous information networks (HINs) across domains such as e-commerce, social media, bioinformatics, and scholarly communication has created an urgent need for advanced methods that can extract latent knowledge and deliver personalized recommendations from multi-typed, multi-relational data. Traditional recommendation algorithms and knowledge discovery techniques often fall short in capturing the complex structural and semantic dependencies inherent in HINs. Graph neural networks (GNNs) have emerged as a powerful paradigm that integrates network topology with node and edge features through iterative message passing and neighborhood aggregation, enabling end-to-end representation learning in heterogeneous spaces. This paper presents a comprehensive framework for GNN-driven knowledge discovery and recommendation within large-scale HINs, emphasizing system-level architectural design, computational trade-offs, deployment scalability, governance considerations, and fairness constraints. We survey foundational GNN variants adapted for heterogeneity, including relational graph convolutional networks, heterogeneous graph transformers, and metapath-guided aggregators, and analyze their respective strengths in capturing multi-hop semantics. The discussion extends to distributed training strategies, online inference pipelines, and memory-efficient sampling techniques required for industrial-scale graphs with billions of nodes and edges. Critical governance challenges such as algorithmic bias amplification through heterophilic links, transparency of learned embeddings, and sustainability of energy-intensive model training are examined through a socio-technical lens. We illustrate cross-domain deployment scenarios in content recommendation, drug discovery, and citation network analysis to highlight architectural invariants and domain-specific adaptations. The paper concludes with forward-looking perspectives on self-supervised learning for heterogeneous graphs, federated privacy-preserving GNNs, and regulatory alignment of automated recommendation systems. This work provides a systematic reference for researchers and practitioners aiming to operationalize GNNs in large-scale heterogeneous knowledge discovery and recommendation infrastructures.

References

1. Y. Sun, J. Han, X. Yan, P. S. Yu, and T. Wu, “PathSim: Meta path-based top-K similarity search in heterogeneous information networks,” in Proc. VLDB Endowment, vol. 4, no. 11, pp. 992–1003, 2011.

2. Y. Sun and J. Han, “Mining heterogeneous information networks: Principles and methodologies,” Synthesis Lectures on Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1–159, 2012.

3. T. N. Kipf and M. Welling, “Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks,” in Proc. ICLR, 2017.

4. M. Schlichtkrull, T. N. Kipf, P. Bloem, R. van den Berg, I. Titov, and M. Welling, “Modeling relational data with graph convolutional networks,” in Proc. ESWC, 2018, pp. 593–607.

5. Z. Hu, Y. Dong, K. Wang, and Y. Sun, “Heterogeneous graph transformer,” in Proc. WWW, 2020, pp. 2704–2710.

6. Y. Dong, N. V. Chawla, and A. Swami, “metapath2vec: Scalable representation learning for heterogeneous networks,” in Proc. KDD, 2017, pp. 135–144.

7. P. Velickovic, G. Cucurull, A. Casanova, A. Romero, P. Lio, and Y. Bengio, “Graph attention networks,” in Proc. ICLR, 2018.

8. W. Hamilton, Z. Ying, and J. Leskovec, “Inductive representation learning on large graphs,” in Proc. NeurIPS, 2017, pp. 1024–1034.

9. X. Fu, J. Zhang, Z. Meng, and I. King, “MAGNN: Metapath aggregated graph neural network for heterogeneous graph embedding,” in Proc. WWW, 2020, pp. 2331–2341.

10. J. Shi, H. Chen, Z. Wu, and Y. Sun, “Auto-HG: Automated meta-path discovery for heterogeneous graph neural networks,” in Proc. KDD, 2021, pp. 1495–1504.

11. C. Zhang, D. Song, C. Huang, A. Swami, and N. V. Chawla, “Heterogeneous graph neural network,” in Proc. KDD, 2019, pp. 793–803.

12. R. Ying, R. He, K. Chen, P. Eksombatchai, W. L. Hamilton, and J. Leskovec, “Graph convolutional neural networks for web-scale recommender systems,” in Proc. KDD, 2018, pp. 974–983.

13. X. Wang, H. Ji, C. Shi, B. Wang, Y. Ye, P. Cui, and P. S. Yu, “Heterogeneous graph attention network,” in Proc. WWW, 2019, pp. 2022–2032.

14. X. Wang, X. He, M. Wang, F. Feng, and T. S. Chua, “Neural graph collaborative filtering,” in Proc. SIGIR, 2019, pp. 165–174.

15. Z. Huang, Z. Li, J. Liu, and X. He, “Heterogeneous graph collaborative filtering,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.12176, 2020.

16. S. R. J. S. Jang, D. Kim, and J. Park, “Distributed training of graph neural networks: A survey,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.01062, 2021.

17. E. Rossi, B. Chamberlain, F. Frasca, D. Eynard, F. Monti, and M. Bronstein, “Temporal graph networks for deep learning on dynamic graphs,” in Proc. ICML Workshop on Graph Representation Learning, 2020.

18. J. Chen, T. Ma, and C. Xiao, “FastGCN: Fast learning with graph convolutional networks via importance sampling,” in Proc. ICLR, 2018.

19. H. Yuan, H. Yu, S. Gui, and S. Ji, “Explainability in graph neural networks: A taxonomic survey,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.15478, 2020.

20. J. Buolamwini and T. Gebru, “Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification,” in Proc. FAT, 2018, pp. 77–91.

21. J. Bose, G. Farnadi, A. Ghodsi, and M. C. M. de Cock, “Fair graph neural networks via adversarial training,” in Proc. AAAI, 2021, pp. 6834–6842.

22. F. Wu, A. Souza, T. Zhang, C. Fifty, T. Yu, and K. Weinberger, “Simplifying graph convolutional networks,” in Proc. ICML, 2019, pp. 6861–6871.

23. Q. Li, Z. Wen, Z. Wu, S. Hu, N. Wang, Y. Li, X. Liu, and B. He, “A survey on federated learning for graph neural networks,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.11046, 2021.

24. J. Wang, P. Huang, H. Zhao, Z. Zhang, B. Zhao, and D. L. Lee, “Billion-scale commodity embedding for e-commerce recommendation in Alibaba,” in Proc. KDD, 2018, pp. 839–848.

25. M. Zitnik, M. Agrawal, and J. Leskovec, “Modeling polypharmacy side effects with graph convolutional networks,” Bioinformatics, vol. 34, no. 13, pp. i457–i466, 2018.

26. T. Liu, X. Wang, J. Tang, and M. Zhang, “Scholar recommendation with heterogeneous information networks,” ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 1–30, 2021.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-22

How to Cite

Graph Neural Network-Driven Knowledge Discovery and Recommendation in Large-Scale Heterogeneous Information Networks. (2022). Journal of Advanced Artificial Intelligence Research, 1(1). https://www.jaair.org/index.php/home/article/view/59